Casio has sued Snapdeal and sellers on its platform
Casio alleged Snapdeal is selling counterfeit versions of its products such as watches and calculators
Snapdeal will approach the court for review and modification of the order
Gurugram-headquartered ecommerce startup Snapdeal has been dragged to court by Japanese consumer electronics giant Casio. The company has sued Snapdeal and sellers on its platform for allegedly selling counterfeit versions of the brand’s products such as watches and calculators.
Tis Hazari court has reportedly restrained Snapdeal and the other accused parties from selling, displaying and advertising goods bearing the Casio trademark. Satoshi Yamazaki, GM at legal department of Casio Computer, said that Casio is extremely sensitive towards protection of its intellectual property rights and has been actively fighting against the counterfeiting menace in India.
“As part of its anti-counterfeiting strategy and in an endeavour to ensure that its customers are not cheated with fakes, Casio has been fighting unscrupulous traders in local markets in India and has now extended its battle versus fakes on the internet,” said Yamazaki said.
Snapdeal, which once held the No. 2 spot in the Indian ecommerce industry, has been in troubled waters for the past few years, with frequent office changes, bursts of hirings alternated with layoffs, and investors writing down investments.
In June 2018, founders Kunal Bahl and Rohit Bansal had informed employees that the company has been cash flow positive which means that the company is now earning money from its business. They also claimed that the company has no current or future dependency on funding, has made the industry sit up and take notice.
A Snapdeal spokesperson reportedly said, “This order has been issued ex-parte and Snapdeal will approach the court for review and modification of the order. In multiple recent cases, broad and sweeping injunctions granted against various marketplaces have, on review, been limited in scope to individual sellers, who may be in breach. A distinction between platforms and sellers is an important one to ensure genuine sellers are not adversely affected due to the actions of a few.”
This is not the first time Snapdeal has found itself dragged in a court case over counterfeit goods. In May 2018, Snapdeal was dragged to courts by its sellers Veepee Electronics and Spacewood Furnishers over alleged non-payment of dues. Some of the other court cases include US footwear maker Skechers had dragged Flipkart and sellers on its platform to court for allegedly selling counterfeit products.Earlier, US footwear maker Skechers had dragged Flipkart and sellers on its platform to court for allegedly selling counterfeit products.
In October, Delhi-based electric appliances maker Marc Enterprises filed a case against ecommerce company Flipkart’s private label MarQ.
Prior to this, Metro Shoes, a multi-brand footwear chain in India, accused Flipkart of selling a private label by the brand name of Metronaut, which is deceptively similar to Metro’s eponymous brand. In June, Mumbai-based tea maker Girnar Food and Beverages Pvt Ltd filed a trademark violation case against grocery startup BigBasket for using the ‘Royal’ trademark to sell several products, including tea.
