Your browser is currently blocking notification.
Please follow this instruction to subscribe:
X
Notifications are already enabled.
X

After 20 Years, Former Paytm Director Alleges Stake In The Company, But Lacks Evidence

After 20 Years, Former Paytm Director Alleges Stake In The Company, But Lacks Evidence

Paytm has denied that Ashok Kumar Saxena owns stake in the company

Our source has revealed that Saxena’s attempts to file a police case against the company have failed

While Saxena was a director in the company in its early days, he is said to have forfeited his seat

As companies look to go public, it’s an opportunity for its core leadership and trusted employees to be a part of their wealth creation, but at times, it also brings in undesired attention due to opportunistic moves by past associates. Paytm is going through something similar as Ashok Kumar Saxena, who had invested a minor amount in the company in its early days has alleged that he owns a significant stake in the fintech giant. One97 Communications, the parent company of Paytm, founded by Vijay Shekhar Sharma in 2000, has dismissed the claim (as per DRHP), and Saxena’s efforts to file a police report are said to have failed, as per sources.

The IPO-bound company has denied that Saxena owns any stake in the company in its draft red herring prospectus for the public offering and a source close to the development revealed that Saxena had gone to court, which had urged the police to start an investigation. But due to lack of documentary evidence, the police could not bring a case against Paytm or investigate the matter.

What Is Saxena’s Claim Against Paytm?

Saxena claims that he was promised a 55% share in the company. He is said to have approached the police in June 2021, as Paytm prepares to list publicly. The police have not noted his complaint and our sources claim Saxena has also attempted to contact the regulators.

Our source revealed that Saxena had invested a total of INR 13 Lakh to One97 Communications Ltd, the parent company of Paytm, and was a director on the board in the early days of the company (between 2001 and 2002 as per earlier news reports), when One97 was incorporated. However, he is said to have forfeited his seat by default after a continued and unexplained absence from board meetings. The source claims that as per Indian law, (Section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956), Saxena ceased to be a member of the board.

In 2004, Saxena is said to have requested for shares in Paytm for the INR 13 Lakh he had invested, which he asked to be transferred to Omkam Technologies Pvt Ltd. But it’s not clear whether his request was complied with.

On his LinkedIn profile, Saxena mentions that he held the position of cofounder of One97 Communications and Paytm between 2000-2012. Inc42 reached out to Saxena earlier this week but did not get responses till the time of publishing. We will be updating this story and development as and when we get the responses from Saxena.

Big Claims But No Evidence

In his allegations and notice, Saxena has called himself a director of One97 Communications, which the company has denied as well. Our source claims that there are no definitive agreements between Saxena and the company. It is interesting to note, that Saxena’s allegations have come almost 20 years after he claims to have made the investment in One97, and at a time when the company is heading for an IPO.

In its DRHP, Paytm claims, “Our Company has been served with a notice under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in relation to certain allegations levied by Mr. Ashok Saxena (“Complainant”) against our Director, Mr. Vijay Shekhar Sharma. The said allegations pertain to, among others, alleged inducement of the Complainant to advance a certain amount of money to our Company, existence of an alleged agreement for allotment of certain shares of our Company to the Complainant until the money advanced by the Complainant was repaid, and misappropriation of such amount, along with non-appointment of the third director nominated by the Complainant and removal of the Complainant from the Company. (“Allegations”). The Notice required our Company to furnish a response to the relevant authorities at Kalkaji Police Station, Delhi.”

It added that the company responded to the notice through correspondence on June 29, 2021 and denied the allegations, while also clarifying the non-existence of any definitive agreement or misappropriation of funds.

Paytm is preparing for one of the largest IPOs in India. The fintech giant filed its DRHP to raise INR 16,600 Cr. According to its DRHP, Paytm saw the number of monthly transacting users (MTU) increase 22% from 41.2 Mn in Q1 FY20 to 50.4 Mn in FY21. However, the digital payments giant saw its overall revenue take a hit amid the pandemic as it fell 9.9% from INR 3,540.77 in FY20 to INR 3,186.8 in FY21 on a consolidated basis.

The company plans to invest INR 4,300 Cr from the IPO proceeds to grow and strengthen its ecosystem through the acquisition and retention of consumers and merchants. It will also invest INR 2,000 Cr towards new business initiatives, acquisitions and strategic partnerships.