Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government

Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government

Online cab aggregators like Ola and Uber have been experiencing a bumpy ride from Indian state governments these past couple of months. After being called up for surge pricing and discrepancies in calculation of fares, the government is still resisting complying with the terms of these new-age services. Both Uber and Ola have registered themselves with the Karnataka On Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rule, 2016, where Ola received the license and Uber didn’t. It continues to face hassles at the hands of the administration.

Uber had approached the court last month, after the state transport department had its vehicles impounded for not having licenses sanctioned under the new rules. It further suspended the operations of taxis in the state, leading to a protest by the drivers.

In a recent hearing, the Karnataka High Court while encouraging the advent of startups in the state, displayed its distaste towards the ‘stifling’ policies adopted by the state government against startups, questioning regulatory norms that are restrictive in nature.

Justice Raghvendra Chauhan on Wednesday said, “On the one hand, you (government) want to encourage startups in the state and, on the other, you want to stifle its business by framing rules like the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Aggregators’ Rules (OTTA).” This comment was made during the hearing regarding the petition by cab-hailing platform Uber.

Justice Chauhan said that these rules would hamper the environment for startups, resulting in a serious downfall in investments in the state.

The transport authority in April had increased the penalty for cab aggregators from INR 1000 to 5000, claiming that their operational services were functioning without necessary licenses despite mandatory regulations and warnings. To this, Uber’s counsel Sajan Poovayya had claimed that since Uber is a technology platform, it cannot be regulated under India’s Motor Vehicles Act, which is responsible for governing taxis in India. The hearing for the case is undergoing where drivers have also independently filed a petition in court.

Uber is currently functioning in 27 cities in India, while its major competitor Ola is operational in 102 cities. The tussle between these companies and the government risks loss of investments and discontinuity of services for everyday customers.

You have reached your limit of free stories
This Diwali, Get Up To 74% Off On Inc42 Plus

Become A Startup Insider With Inc42 Plus

Inc42 Plus Diwali Offer Ends In
countdownmail.com
2 YEAR PLAN
₹19999
₹6499
₹270/Month
UNLOCK 68% OFF
Cancel Anytime
1 YEAR PLAN
₹9999
₹3499
₹291/Month
UNLOCK 65% OFF
Cancel Anytime
Already A Member?
Discover Startups & Business Models

Unleash your potential by exploring unlimited articles, trackers, and playbooks. Identify the hottest startup deals, supercharge your innovation projects, and stay updated with expert curation.

Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government-Inc42 Media
How-To’s on Starting & Scaling Up

Empower yourself with comprehensive playbooks, expert analysis, and invaluable insights. Learn to validate ideas, acquire customers, secure funding, and navigate the journey to startup success.

Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government-Inc42 Media
Identify Trends & New Markets

Access 75+ in-depth reports on frontier industries. Gain exclusive market intelligence, understand market landscapes, and decode emerging trends to make informed decisions.

Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government-Inc42 Media
Track & Decode the Investment Landscape

Stay ahead with startup and funding trackers. Analyse investment strategies, profile successful investors, and keep track of upcoming funds, accelerators, and more.

Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government-Inc42 Media
Uber Vs Karnataka: High Court Questions State Government-Inc42 Media
You’re in Good company