An Angel Investor’s Tryst With BYJU’S And LinkedIn; The Free Speech Conundrum

An Angel Investor’s Tryst With BYJU’S And LinkedIn; The Free Speech Conundrum

SUMMARY

LinkedIn banning angel investor Dr Aniruddha Malpani for posts critical of edtech giant BYJU’S highlights the issue of social media’s control over online speech

Beyond LinkedIn, the likes of Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram have also had to take down content on the behest of companies and brands

When authentic criticism can be suppressed without a public debate, is there any way that social media platforms can claim to be paragons of free speech?

“I have nothing against BYJU’s, I just take BYJU’s as representative (of the issue of corporate governance). I am sure others must be equally bad. You know why? Because everyone is now trying to copy BYJU’s. So they put someone who used to work at BYJU’s and they used to copy and paste all their mis-selling techniques and all the rubbish they used to do because this is the best way to make money very quickly,” he said.

There’s something to be said about freedom of speech online — or lack thereof — when a powerful startup can use its muscle to act against critics on social media. If indeed the so-called protectors of speech and expression in the digital age can be coerced into deleting posts and content to protect the interests of one company, then what hope do people have in getting their voices heard.

modal lock
You're In Private Mode!

want to read the full story?

Login or create a free account to continue reading in private mode.