Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention

Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention

SUMMARY

IiAS has urged SEBI to examine whether Paytm’s CEO meets the definition of a promoter

The advisory firm called on the SEBI to examine Sharma’s move to trim his direct stake in Paytm by transferring his shares to a family trust

Paytm spent INR 564 Cr on ESOP expenses towards directors, KMPs and relatives of key management personnel in H1 FY23

Training guns at Paytm, proxy advisory firm Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IiAS) has now raised concerns that the fintech major could be bypassing laws to grant employee stock options (ESOPs) to its founder and chief executive officer (CEO) Vijay Shekhar Sharma.

In a note, the advisory firm raised two concerns – whether Sharma meets the definition of a promoter under the SEBI norms, and whether his direct or indirect cumulative shareholding in the fintech major was less than 10%.

The advisory firm called on the SEBI to examine Sharma’s move to trim his direct stake in Paytm by transferring his shares to a family trust. 

“SEBI needs to consider if Vijay Shekhar Sharma’s direct equity and that held on behalf of Sharma Family Trust ought to be aggregated to test for compliance with the 10% threshold set out in both, under Indian regulations and Paytm’s ESOP scheme,” said IiAS. 

This is the advisory firm’s major contention, as the law bars issuance of ESOPs to promoters, who, directly or indirectly, hold more than 10% of the firm.

The advisory firm claimed that Sharma enjoyed the rights of a promoter, including a potential seat at the company’s board, even though he is not listed as one. Under Paytm’s articles of association, Sharma can appoint a board member if he holds more than 2.5% stake and an executive position in the fintech major. 

Lashing out at the fintech top executive, IiAS said, “These provisions and structures give Vijay Shekhar Sharma ‘entrenchment’ similar to that enjoyed by promoter families in the more traditional companies.”

Meanwhile, in a statement sent to news agency ANI, the fintech major has rubbished IiAS’ claims, saying that it followed all norms, including shareholders approval, while granting ESOPs. 

Noting that Sharma’s remuneration was fixed for the next three years without any annual increment, Paytm added that this practice was also unlike policies applicable to other company employees and in other firms. 

“Moreover, in earlier years, Sharma gave 4% of his equity to create an ESOP pool for Paytm that helped the company to attract talent. Sharma has never received any ESOP before the IPO, while there are enough examples of founders receiving 5% to 10% as ESOPs,” a company spokesperson said. 

On questions surrounding Sharma enjoying rights as a promoter, the fintech major told the news agency that there were specific provisions of the law that dictate whether a shareholder is classified as a promoter or not, adding that Sharma’s classification as a non-promoter was entirely in accordance with the applicable law.

In The Line Of Fire

At the end of financial year 2021-22 (FY22), Paytm reported that its ESOP expenses on account of key management personnel (KMPs), including CEO and managing director Vijay Shekhar Sharma and CFO Madhur Deora, grew 50X to INR 567 Cr in FY22.

According to a recent regulatory filing, the fintech major spent INR 564 Cr in lieu of ESOP expenses towards directors, KMPs and relatives of the KMPs in the first half of FY23.

The fintech major has been criticised for granting big ESOPs to top executives despite a tumultuous 2022. The company saw its losses balloon as macroeconomic pressures wreaked havoc on the fintech major. 

Shares plummeted to record lows, falling more than 57% from its 12-week high of INR 1,288.70 in January last year. The expiration of the lock-in period for pre-IPO investors also saw investors leave in droves, including tech investor SoftBank, which offloaded 4.5% stake in Paytm.

Interestingly, this is not the first time that the advisory firm has questioned the fintech major publicly. In 2022, IiAS opposed the reappointment of Vijay Shekhar Sharma as the CEO of Paytm. Recently, it raised questions on the company’s share buyback plan.

Shares of Paytm closed at INR 550.70 on the BSE on Friday.

You have reached your limit of free stories
Become An Inc42 Plus Member

Become a Startup Insider in 2024 with Inc42 Plus. Join our exclusive community of 10,000+ founders, investors & operators and stay ahead in India’s startup & business economy.

2 YEAR PLAN
₹19999
₹7999
₹333/Month
Unlock 60% OFF
Cancel Anytime
1 YEAR PLAN
₹9999
₹4999
₹416/Month
Unlock 50% OFF
Cancel Anytime
Already A Member?
Discover Startups & Business Models

Unleash your potential by exploring unlimited articles, trackers, and playbooks. Identify the hottest startup deals, supercharge your innovation projects, and stay updated with expert curation.

Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention-Inc42 Media
How-To’s on Starting & Scaling Up

Empower yourself with comprehensive playbooks, expert analysis, and invaluable insights. Learn to validate ideas, acquire customers, secure funding, and navigate the journey to startup success.

Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention-Inc42 Media
Identify Trends & New Markets

Access 75+ in-depth reports on frontier industries. Gain exclusive market intelligence, understand market landscapes, and decode emerging trends to make informed decisions.

Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention-Inc42 Media
Track & Decode the Investment Landscape

Stay ahead with startup and funding trackers. Analyse investment strategies, profile successful investors, and keep track of upcoming funds, accelerators, and more.

Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention-Inc42 Media
Advisory Firm IiAS Questions ESOPs For Paytm CEO, Demands SEBI’s Intervention-Inc42 Media
You’re in Good company