SUMMARY
According to sources since there’s no comprehensive list of Chinese apps that can be banned in one go
Last Tuesday, the government banned a fresh set of 43 Chinese mobile apps, including the likes of Alibaba Workbench, CamCard and a host of dating apps
This is the fourth instance of the government banning Chinese apps since the India-China border skirmish erupted
The government is in the process of preparing a fresh list of Chinese mobile apps that would be banned “very shortly.”
According to sources since there’s no comprehensive list of Chinese apps that can be banned in one go, the process adopted is to follow the apps that find traction in app stores and are being downloaded the most. Once this is done, strict monitoring is done and action taken.
There are several apps, which, despite being banned, reappear through proxies and, therefore, continuous monitoring needs to be done, the Indian Express reported.
Last Tuesday, the government banned a fresh set of 43 Chinese mobile apps, including the likes of Alibaba Workbench, CamCard and a host of dating apps among others, by invoking Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.
This is the fourth instance of the government banning Chinese apps since the India-China border skirmish erupted. The government had first banned 59 apps, including TikTok, WeChat, followed by another set of 47 apps in July, which were proxies of the banned apps.
On September 2, it banned 118 Chinese mobile apps, which included the popular gaming platform PUBG as well as Baidu, which is China’s largest search engine provider.
In all, around 220 apps have been banned since June but the redressal mechanism for the first set is far from over.
What The Law Says
In the case of app bans, the law is such that the government does not need to first serve a notice to the companies concerned and wait for their replies. The companies concerned also cannot approach courts for any interim relief.
This is because the government has emergency powers under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act to block any content where it is satisfied that it is against the country’s sovereignty, integrity, and defence, and in such cases the law does not require it to serve any prior notice to the content providers concerned before ordering a ban.
The rules under Section 69A are such that the companies concerned can represent their case to the government after the ban, which will then conduct a full-fledged inquiry by an inter-ministerial panel into the matter. This inter-ministerial body will subsequently submit its report to the IT secretary, who, based on the evidence, will decide the future course.
If the secretary feels the ban is justified and needs to be continued, the companies concerned then have an option to appeal before the cabinet secretary, who will then form a panel to hear them. This panel would not include the IT secretary as it is on his decision that an appeal has been made.
